So far, reactions have been mixed. The state of Alaska and Alaska Native corporations, which rely heavily on oil and gas dollars, say the red tape and the habitat’s vast size will spell huge revenue losses. Environmentalists cheer the move but fear it won’t be enforced. To save polar bears, they say, list them as endangered, not threatened. That would bolster legal protections and leave more room to tackle the chief threat to the animals’ territory: the greenhouse gas emissions causing climate change. —Jeremy Berlin
Polarizing Move
Admin
View all posts
Related Posts
10 Reasons to Visit Reykjavik
Reykjavik has a population of about 200,000, which is about 60% of Iceland’s population. It is also the World’s northernmost…
Read More
Top languages spoken in today’s world.
An infograph related to the top languages that are spoken in the world and more information about them. Link
Read More
Africa Development
A visualization of a clients business model in working with remote villages in Tanzania. Link
Read More
